• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ?
Arthur Macmillan
Senior Member
****
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 257

Reputation: 1
#24
11-22-2016, 08:30 AM
Quote:  Here's a shot that I took of an egret through leaves and branches heavily cropped and PPed, I'm not claiming it's an art work or the like, but before processing it just wasn't a shot at all.
 

I would call the photo an art work.  A very interesting set of contrasts.  Light/dark, big/small, subtle/imposing, still/dynamic.  Also has a nice painterly quality.

 

I can't really address the JPEG issue because I didn't realize there was a big difference in various implementations.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:28 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 10:54 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-18-2016, 02:25 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 03:53 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 05:16 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 06:05 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:39 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 06:55 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-19-2016, 07:49 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 01:30 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Arthur Macmillan - 11-22-2016, 08:30 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-22-2016, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)