12-26-2016, 09:54 AM
Quote:JoJu and I were specifically talking about small mirrorless bodies and the ergonomic issues that brings. That has little to do with the number of AF points in any given model, does it? I can well understand that you would prefer a more advanced sports AF system, as you are used to that and most probably use it a lot.
The ergonomics on your !D mk IV are nicer than on small cramped mirrorless bodies as well, in many areas. You can even operate it when using gloves, and the menu structure is mostly very well thought out.
As mentioned before, ergonomics are personal, you should not generalize. Some people prefer smaller cameras and lenses, other bigger ones. Do note that size and weight also influences ergonomic experience. There is not a single truth in this respect.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....