01-07-2017, 09:38 PM
That does make sense, as there always is a use case for different size systems anyway. Most of those in the links above only use MFT however.
Myself, I will be using both MFT and FF for the next few years to come, but as I indicated in another post, FF will mostly become the new MF for me, and essentially MFT will become, or already is, my main lug around everywhere system
. I have sold off my Canon G10, which I have replaced with a Pen F
, which I literally carry with me at all times, and the E-M1 Mk II now is my main camera. Instead of the 5D Mk II, which is, hopefully soon, to be replaced with a 5Ds or 5DsR, for very high resolution landscapes mostly.
The 20MP of the Oly's is more than enough for me for up to 80 cm X 60 cm prints anyway. And in case I need a really fast lens, with very shallow DoF, I have my Canon lenses with Metabones Speedboosters
.
Kind regards, Wim
Myself, I will be using both MFT and FF for the next few years to come, but as I indicated in another post, FF will mostly become the new MF for me, and essentially MFT will become, or already is, my main lug around everywhere system


The 20MP of the Oly's is more than enough for me for up to 80 cm X 60 cm prints anyway. And in case I need a really fast lens, with very shallow DoF, I have my Canon lenses with Metabones Speedboosters

Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....