01-23-2017, 11:55 AM
The advantage with my FF system is that I already own all the (high grade) lenses I'd ever want and want to carry, except maybe extreme UWA. I doubt whether any, or rather all of these will be available anytime soon for the Fuji, not to mention the pricing. I'd rather go for a less conspicuous camera with a slightly smaller sensor in that case. As to lenses, think long macrolens, tilt shift, dedicated macro, a bunch of primes, and a long zoom ....
The cheaper option would definitely be a 50MP FF camera for me .
I have been playing with the idea of MF for a long time, as well as larger formats, film in that case, but I doubt I would ever even bother to carry an even bigger imaging apparatus with me than a relatively small FF camera plus lenses.
Besides, I reckon an MF camera really ends up being a studio camera more than a take anywhere camera, even when made as small as possible like the Fuji . I prefer handheld use over tripod use .
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....