11-05-2010, 09:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2010, 09:35 PM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='robbiec' timestamp='1288987093' post='3978']
Methinks there will be a lot of Canon and Nikon fans questioning DXOmark now that there is an interloper within their ranks! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
Do you not believe that Hoya / Pentax with their medical image and software expertise cannot leverage this within the K-5s algorithms? Fact is, according to DXO, Pentax rules in the APS-C world until the next big thing comes along.
[/quote]
What about RAW don't you understand though... RAW is supposed to be RAW, not processed by whatever.
DXO mark is supposed to "measure" the sensor performance, and it does not do that when it can't take into account processing done to make a sensor look better in these tests.
Methinks there will be a lot of Canon and Nikon fans questioning DXOmark now that there is an interloper within their ranks! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
Do you not believe that Hoya / Pentax with their medical image and software expertise cannot leverage this within the K-5s algorithms? Fact is, according to DXO, Pentax rules in the APS-C world until the next big thing comes along.
[/quote]
What about RAW don't you understand though... RAW is supposed to be RAW, not processed by whatever.
DXO mark is supposed to "measure" the sensor performance, and it does not do that when it can't take into account processing done to make a sensor look better in these tests.