02-24-2017, 03:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2017, 03:01 AM by Brightcolours.)
I do not get at all why Matt was surprised, it is all in the specs?
The 1st test shws the issue (focus breathing of the widening kind). The new Tamron is as bad as the old one and the Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 II.
The second test he shot at different distances (the lenses have different MFDs). Why does it surprise you that the Tamron at 0.9 meters gets more magnification than the Nikkor at 1.4 meters?
It is the same as the difference from the Tamron at 1.4 meters and 0.9 meters.
The 1st test shws the issue (focus breathing of the widening kind). The new Tamron is as bad as the old one and the Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 II.
The second test he shot at different distances (the lenses have different MFDs). Why does it surprise you that the Tamron at 0.9 meters gets more magnification than the Nikkor at 1.4 meters?
It is the same as the difference from the Tamron at 1.4 meters and 0.9 meters.