04-17-2017, 12:33 PM
I have no need of the D7500, why? because I have the D500, so no, I will not be buying one!
This shot might explain why the D7200 would not cut it for me, I had been going to the river regularly to photograph an egret who fishes on the river, one day 'Bingo" I got him catching a fish, two shots with the fish at the end of his beak, one as the fish was going in his mouth (shown here) and no more...1/2 second it took!
For all those days sitting by the river I got three/four images of the "catch" and only one with the fish entering his mouth and that's at 10 Fps.
Would I have caught the moment with the D7200? probably not, with the D7500? I may have done, maybe not.... but I got the little bugger with the D500.
After all that time sitting by the river for weeks I would have been gutted if I missed it!
So yes I "do" care about an extra 2-3 Fps and a whole lot more about 4-5 Fps!
20 Fps would be nicer.
This shot might explain why the D7200 would not cut it for me, I had been going to the river regularly to photograph an egret who fishes on the river, one day 'Bingo" I got him catching a fish, two shots with the fish at the end of his beak, one as the fish was going in his mouth (shown here) and no more...1/2 second it took!
For all those days sitting by the river I got three/four images of the "catch" and only one with the fish entering his mouth and that's at 10 Fps.
Would I have caught the moment with the D7200? probably not, with the D7500? I may have done, maybe not.... but I got the little bugger with the D500.
After all that time sitting by the river for weeks I would have been gutted if I missed it!
So yes I "do" care about an extra 2-3 Fps and a whole lot more about 4-5 Fps!
20 Fps would be nicer.