[toni-a]

Of course Oly PRO (and non-PRO) lenses can be adjusted. Actually, you can adjust AF as well, in-camera, certainly in teh E-M1, and AFAIK, in most other bodies as well.


Olympus does offer a PRO service as well, since the end of last year.


The question is whether you'd want to pay twice as much or even more, for a similar lens in FF. And please no equivalence arguments. Although equivalence wise a lens may have the DoF of a FF lens at twice the aperture number, it still is a lens at that aperture.


The only reason to go FF is for more noisefree images in difficult circumstances, or for very high resolution. However, MFT suffers much lens from banding and blotching than most DSLRs do, so from that POV up to 1600 iso and 3200 iso the cameras are easily as usable as with dslrs. In addition, IS with any of these cameras i smore advanced than any other system, so you can easily handhold shots at shutter speeds which are unheard of with non-MFT cameras. As mentioned higher up, no substitue for sports shooting (although the E-M1 comes very close), but certainly great for all kinds of images which do not have a lot of movement.


Kind regards, Wim

Thanks Wim, usually I am not the guy that argues, when I ask a question it's for learning not arguing.

If Olympus service is capable of correcting acquired decentering and the lenses are designed with long term use in mind then professionals would be more interested in MFT.

Despite not offering the best low light capabilities, nor the highest dynamic range, nor low prices. Many professionals aren't moving away, what's the main reason? It's the good service, quality of the products, when before buying a lens you know that you will be able to use it with high quality images for years, You will be encouraged to gt it. And most important you will be afraid investing in other systems.