• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > AFMA: Canon and Nikon
#3
I never compared Canon to Nikon results. I also have to say: My lens calculations were not delivered to their database from a certain moment on, because FoCal's business model is:

Buy the software (in my case the Pro-version, although limited to a low number of bodies)

one year access to database (also to cross-reference my results)

after that year they open up their hand again, if I want to access the database. And of course also for a main update

 

I'm judging this pretty greedy. I already paid more, but they don't pay me for my time and results I delivered to their database? A little bit too one-sided for my taste. I switched off the upload to their server.

 

As to the Nikon results: Seem credible to me. With regular Nikon lenses and three different bodies I had also a wide range of results. That could be explained with a less good quality control. But also the reliability of Nikon's AF has a wider range than I would wish for.

 

Okay, blurred shots I also can provoke with mirrorless. I just need to switch to AF-C on Fuji, hahahaha.

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by popo - 05-26-2017, 04:15 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by Brightcolours - 05-26-2017, 04:34 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2017, 04:45 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by obican - 05-26-2017, 04:55 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2017, 05:00 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by stoppingdown - 05-26-2017, 05:31 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by popo - 05-26-2017, 10:57 PM
AFMA: Canon and Nikon - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2017, 11:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)