06-10-2017, 07:47 AM
15% more diagonal distance (APS-C vs APS-H), costing 50% more for the camera... If one doesn't need the "biggest Foveon sensor Sigma ever made", one can save 400 bucks and invest it in a lens. So, meanwhile I see the sd quattro H as very hypothetical. Also, each exposure means 40 MB more on a sd-card (110 vs 150MB, if the camera is set to DNG).
My idea of getting a sd quattro H and 18-35 + this 50-100 for landscape has become close to pointless - I really can stay with a light tripod, 3 old Sigma Merrills + dp0 quattro, save weight, money and disk-space. ^_^ Only if I ever would get the idea, landscapes are more interesting with a 100-400 lens, I will try to remember there's one combo for that.
My idea of getting a sd quattro H and 18-35 + this 50-100 for landscape has become close to pointless - I really can stay with a light tripod, 3 old Sigma Merrills + dp0 quattro, save weight, money and disk-space. ^_^ Only if I ever would get the idea, landscapes are more interesting with a 100-400 lens, I will try to remember there's one combo for that.