09-04-2017, 05:54 AM
I don't think this penis comparison is helpful - it's not artificially made or designed and the top of professional sensors is around 100 MP. These are computable although not with a smartphone and these sensor-backs are on sale. There's no real practical benefit of an abnormal body part while the 46 MP automatically lead to an APS-C coverage of 20 MP - and save one extra camera which I find pretty nice for crops.
Although for some testers
it appears to be impossible to get to an optical rating of a lens if the sensor is too big. That reminds me of an "interview" I think Adorama had with two Nikon reps. Being asked which lenses they would recommend for their camera, one immediately said "goldring Nikkors" and at least one viewer immediately thought "that just won't do, fellas" 
Oh no, silly me: It wasn't Adorama, it was Nikon themselves who answered to user questions in their livestream
Although for some testers
it appears to be impossible to get to an optical rating of a lens if the sensor is too big. That reminds me of an "interview" I think Adorama had with two Nikon reps. Being asked which lenses they would recommend for their camera, one immediately said "goldring Nikkors" and at least one viewer immediately thought "that just won't do, fellas" Oh no, silly me: It wasn't Adorama, it was Nikon themselves who answered to user questions in their livestream