11-21-2010, 07:39 AM
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1290107802' post='4256']
Did you actually ever shoot with any of these? I've shot a Nikkor 14-24 on a 5D II with G-EOS adapter for about 4 months, before I had a TS-E 17L, and although the Nikkor is very good, it is not as good as the 17L, at least not based on the specimens I owned myself (still own 17L). I also shot the ZE 21, and took a few shots with the ZE 18.
Sorry to say, but IMO the 17L beats them all. It is sharper in the corners then any of the others. That's unshifted.
[/quote]
So you're saying that an unshifted f/4 TS-prime is sharper in the corners than an f/2.8 zoom? Now that's hardly surprising, is it? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Did you actually ever shoot with any of these? I've shot a Nikkor 14-24 on a 5D II with G-EOS adapter for about 4 months, before I had a TS-E 17L, and although the Nikkor is very good, it is not as good as the 17L, at least not based on the specimens I owned myself (still own 17L). I also shot the ZE 21, and took a few shots with the ZE 18.
Sorry to say, but IMO the 17L beats them all. It is sharper in the corners then any of the others. That's unshifted.
[/quote]
So you're saying that an unshifted f/4 TS-prime is sharper in the corners than an f/2.8 zoom? Now that's hardly surprising, is it? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />