09-14-2017, 04:04 PM
Well, to a certain point I do agree: Real world pictures are a different story than shooting test boards.
However, I don't expect a sensor showing weaknesses on a testboard to be much better (in aspects of noise in shadows, shadows and highlights to be recoverable) in real life than a sensor with less weaknesses. Therefore the lemon in DR remains at Canon
It's no point to adapt one theory to real life na dthe other leaving in theory.
It's a bit the same story with equivalence- it's just highly theoretical maths as there are effects of general sharpness, corner sharpness, contrast and bokeh behaviour of a lens coming into play when it comes to real world prints. And all of a sudden f/2 is not the same DoF as f/3 or f/8 not the same as f/12
However, I don't expect a sensor showing weaknesses on a testboard to be much better (in aspects of noise in shadows, shadows and highlights to be recoverable) in real life than a sensor with less weaknesses. Therefore the lemon in DR remains at Canon
It's no point to adapt one theory to real life na dthe other leaving in theory.It's a bit the same story with equivalence- it's just highly theoretical maths as there are effects of general sharpness, corner sharpness, contrast and bokeh behaviour of a lens coming into play when it comes to real world prints. And all of a sudden f/2 is not the same DoF as f/3 or f/8 not the same as f/12