09-15-2017, 07:33 AM
I've seen it over at Nikon rumors last tuesday: https://nikonrumors.com/2017/09/12/tamro...soon.aspx/ and thought "another we too lens". As good as it is to have choices, I could not spot a diffenreces aside from design. At second look, the difference could be: at least the Tamron has an oppportuints to mount a tripod collar. I can't see that on the Sigma.
I guess both lenses are worth to be considered an alternative to genuine 100-400. At least the Nikon one is very expensive and heavy. (1570 g for the Nikon 80-400 VRII, 1160 g for the Sigma 100-400)
I guess both lenses are worth to be considered an alternative to genuine 100-400. At least the Nikon one is very expensive and heavy. (1570 g for the Nikon 80-400 VRII, 1160 g for the Sigma 100-400)