[JJ_SO]

12-24/4 is pretty close in weight to 16-35/4 and also almost similar in size too. Looks like this 8-16 will be huge but not unmanagable. Not a reason to switch to Fuji from Sony though.

 

Hmmm... interesting site, but I was refering to this picture (from lensrentals):

 



 

And here the 16-35/4 is the dwarf in the middle.

 

thxbb12, I know your reasoning is reasonable like "most people put the pictures somewhere in the internet or mail them" and for this purpose APS-C or µ4/3 is perfect. Nothing against this point.

 

It's just: for me, landscape is the bigger the sensor, the better the resolution. Sure, also the bigger the back-pain  but I'm no fan of superwide with "small" sensors (I know, these two formats are not the smallest possible).

 

I just got 10 A1 posters back from print service. The prints from the Fuji don't look really bad - but in 12 MP more and double sensor area, I still see more details.

 

Speaking of super-wides: At the moment I try to stop myself from going the 14/1.8 Art path, but my resistance is not too hard...