09-30-2017, 09:21 PM
The Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS HSM is pretty close to what that Canon lens does, just cheaper, more sturdy and less heavy. That Canon 17-55mm is not a good example at all "for which one would invest in a system".
And you should not call it an investment, as one does not buy such consumer photo gear to make a profit with it. Rather, just call it an expense?
And you should not call it an investment, as one does not buy such consumer photo gear to make a profit with it. Rather, just call it an expense?