06-12-2010, 12:46 PM
[quote name='exuvia' date='12 June 2010 - 10:04 AM' timestamp='1276333476' post='448']
Under this point of view, Silkypix is still the best, by far. You can correct vertical and horizontal perspective and the picture cover the frame automatically; Sadly it now is behind about resolution: in the past it was "good enough", at least to me, but the other improved a lot resolution wise. But features like perspective correction and the almost magical CA correction (simple like a click, no lost of resolution), make me still use it (not to talk about the color rendition, still the best of the bunch to me).
If you shoot architecture and need a lot of perspective correction, you might want to try it.
[/quote]
Thanks!
Actually covering the frame is not a problem with perspective correction in LR; you can just use the scale slider until all is visible. The problem is that doing this effectively reduces resolution (as against PTlens). But I think that even with the reduced method the result is better than I've been able to get with SilkyPix.
Under this point of view, Silkypix is still the best, by far. You can correct vertical and horizontal perspective and the picture cover the frame automatically; Sadly it now is behind about resolution: in the past it was "good enough", at least to me, but the other improved a lot resolution wise. But features like perspective correction and the almost magical CA correction (simple like a click, no lost of resolution), make me still use it (not to talk about the color rendition, still the best of the bunch to me).
If you shoot architecture and need a lot of perspective correction, you might want to try it.
[/quote]
Thanks!
Actually covering the frame is not a problem with perspective correction in LR; you can just use the scale slider until all is visible. The problem is that doing this effectively reduces resolution (as against PTlens). But I think that even with the reduced method the result is better than I've been able to get with SilkyPix.