10-09-2017, 05:31 AM
Quote:Of course not. The Nikkor 12-24mm f4 is NOT a Tokina lens in any way, shape or form.
Tokina's 16-50mm f2.8 was the worst lens of its kind. And a Pentax lens.
Tokina did not have a 10-16mm lens.
The Tokina 10-17mm fisheye was not popular, that is why it disappeared. Also not a Tokina but a Pentax lens.
Ah... the DA*16-50mm F2.8 Pentax lens, note the star, actually, I had the lens for a short while, I bought it inexpensively because it had the ubiquitous "dead" SDM motor syndrome........I had the lens repaired FOC......but it had the common Pentax trait of being poorly centered...
I found that the lens had a poor mechanical design, the front element assembly runs on three thin plastic rails which quickly wear and produce wobble...
...the CA is monstrous at wide angles and is of the blue and yellow type....at F5.6 things come together however..
Indeed, another lens that Pentax need to update......but I digress....
In Dustin Abbot's stand-up battle of the 24-70s... G2 vs the Sigma Art... suddenly Dustin throws the Canon L MKII into the the mix......
...the Canon does very well......there's no doubt that when Canon created their "holy trinity" they rose to the occasion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh_r8Pe2wb0&t=64s