[stoppingdown]

@studor13

 

I didn't say that if I own a camera I can do everything I like with it. For instance, I know that I can't throw it on the head of somebody.

 

What I said is that I own that camera and, normally, nobody can stop me from owning it - I mean they can't take it away from me. If I am forced to rent a camera, the day can come that the renter refuses to service me - for whichever reason, which can be even good in his own perspective, and note that I'm not contesting the idea that he can have the right not to service me. Simply, I don't want to put myself in that situation.

 

PS The farmer has got the right to prevent you from entering in his land. He doesn't own the air and the sky above the land, but you're on his land. If you can hover over his land, fine.

 

For instance, in Italy there is an old law that allows hunters to enter in somebody's private property for hunting, without asking for permission. Note that game is not owned by the farmer even though it's on his land, but according to the law is a sort of public property. I'm not particularly against hunting, but if somebody wants to prevent hunting from happening on his land, for good or bad reasons, he's got the right to do that: game might be of public property, but land is owned by the farmer; he's got the right to fence it and prevent access, or grant it only under permission.

 

PS2 This law dates back to Mussolini, that wanted to push hunting to prepare italians to war...