11-24-2010, 12:39 PM
[quote name='thw' timestamp='1290601749' post='4389']
That is very peculiar in view of what's shown on many other websites.
[/quote]
Why? According to IR, A55 does better than 7D for resolution
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E7D/E7DIMAGING.HTM
"Our laboratory resolution chart showed the Canon 7D's images with sharp, distinct line patterns down to about *2,100 lines per picture height horizontally and 2,000* lines vertically. Extinction occurred at about 3,100 lines in both directions"
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55IMAGING.HTM
"In camera JPEGs of our laboratory resolution chart revealed sharp, distinct line patterns down to about *2,200 lines per picture height in the horizontal direction, and about 2,100* lines per picture height in the vertical direction. Complete extinction of the pattern didn't occur until about 2,800 to 3,000 lines."
That is very peculiar in view of what's shown on many other websites.
[/quote]
Why? According to IR, A55 does better than 7D for resolution
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E7D/E7DIMAGING.HTM
"Our laboratory resolution chart showed the Canon 7D's images with sharp, distinct line patterns down to about *2,100 lines per picture height horizontally and 2,000* lines vertically. Extinction occurred at about 3,100 lines in both directions"
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55IMAGING.HTM
"In camera JPEGs of our laboratory resolution chart revealed sharp, distinct line patterns down to about *2,200 lines per picture height in the horizontal direction, and about 2,100* lines per picture height in the vertical direction. Complete extinction of the pattern didn't occur until about 2,800 to 3,000 lines."