11-24-2010, 01:20 PM
[quote name='thw' timestamp='1290598773' post='4383']
Klauss, I don't think you need bother getting the camera serviced or replaced. The K5 has very strong built-in RAW NR. Pentax used to implement mandatory NR for RAW only at ISO 3200 and above. Now, they've really gone overboard... in their quest for 'seemingly higher DR' at low ISO. Sigh..
But it should not stop you from reviewing Pentax lenses, should it?
[/quote]
Is there a proof for this ?
It is hard to distinguish NR from blur on micro level but the edges appear to be too uniform to be NRed. That's just a guess of course.
However, even so the AA filter removal should make a difference.
Klauss, I don't think you need bother getting the camera serviced or replaced. The K5 has very strong built-in RAW NR. Pentax used to implement mandatory NR for RAW only at ISO 3200 and above. Now, they've really gone overboard... in their quest for 'seemingly higher DR' at low ISO. Sigh..
But it should not stop you from reviewing Pentax lenses, should it?
[/quote]
Is there a proof for this ?
It is hard to distinguish NR from blur on micro level but the edges appear to be too uniform to be NRed. That's just a guess of course.
However, even so the AA filter removal should make a difference.