[MatjazO]

As pointed out, a 200mm f2.8 FF lens is a lot cheaper. So, why would you expect a MFT 200mm f2.8 to be a lot more expensive?

Well, you did answer yourself pretty good a few days ago:

Regarding comparing with the Canon EF 200mm f2.8 L II:

• It makes sense to compare it, because the same focal length and max. aperture, should give a comparable price
• Still not fair to compare it, because that Canon lens is a really old lens, with a really deflated price. A new Canon EF 200mm f2.8 L IS USM would not cost $750. Probably also not as high as $3000, though 

😉