11-22-2017, 07:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2017, 07:31 AM by Brightcolours.)
It again is clear (to me at least) that the way you guys approach the MFT tests with the sharpening makes for problematic results that no one really can evaluate.
The sharpening exaggerates sharpness, and will not touch less sharp results, exaggerating the difference in corners and center, and also skewing results twice when comparing for instance how that Nikkor 14-24mm f2.8 did on 24mp.
I also wonder if the R-ness of the 5DS-R also brings its own part of the problem, here. Fake sharpness from "no" AA-filter skewing results up until the lens acts as AA-filter (corners).
Something worth investigating?
The 50mp versus 21mp results do show part of the sharpening issue(s). The 50mp extreme corners getting lower results than the 21mp extreme corners.
The sharpening exaggerates sharpness, and will not touch less sharp results, exaggerating the difference in corners and center, and also skewing results twice when comparing for instance how that Nikkor 14-24mm f2.8 did on 24mp.
I also wonder if the R-ness of the 5DS-R also brings its own part of the problem, here. Fake sharpness from "no" AA-filter skewing results up until the lens acts as AA-filter (corners).
Something worth investigating?
The 50mp versus 21mp results do show part of the sharpening issue(s). The 50mp extreme corners getting lower results than the 21mp extreme corners.