11-26-2010, 07:02 AM
One more thing:
At the time the Olympus E-3 was released I criticized the camera because it produces a relatively weak effective resolution. In RAW mode it delivered barely more than 2000 LW/PH (@ 10mp). The very same arguments like yours popped up around the usual suspect forums.
Now that the E-5 is there with a very weak (if any) AA filter things have suddenly changed. Suddenly the sharp results are the best thing ever since sliced bread (and basically no complaints about moiress).
Maybe something to think about in terms of brand perception and owner psychology.
At the time the Olympus E-3 was released I criticized the camera because it produces a relatively weak effective resolution. In RAW mode it delivered barely more than 2000 LW/PH (@ 10mp). The very same arguments like yours popped up around the usual suspect forums.
Now that the E-5 is there with a very weak (if any) AA filter things have suddenly changed. Suddenly the sharp results are the best thing ever since sliced bread (and basically no complaints about moiress).
Maybe something to think about in terms of brand perception and owner psychology.