11-26-2010, 10:37 AM
[quote name='awaldram' timestamp='1290766085' post='4462']
I understand your 2350 figure but personally think you've gone well into the false positive realm but as we say its all pretty subjective. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
I think you are right with your "going well into the false positive realm" comment, but don't quite understand why you regard it as "subjective" rather than "inappropriate"?
[quote name='awaldram' timestamp='1290766085' post='4462']
As I can easily see false detail well past 2800.
[/quote]
Do we agree that there is no point in looking for false detail and that this means that the K10D figure is inflated? I don't think we should be looking into pushing the K-5 figure but rather bringing down the K10D figure. Agreed?
I still think there is some clarification needed as to whether we are talking about B&W LW/PH in the case of the K10D or not.
I understand your 2350 figure but personally think you've gone well into the false positive realm but as we say its all pretty subjective. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[/quote]
I think you are right with your "going well into the false positive realm" comment, but don't quite understand why you regard it as "subjective" rather than "inappropriate"?
[quote name='awaldram' timestamp='1290766085' post='4462']
As I can easily see false detail well past 2800.
[/quote]
Do we agree that there is no point in looking for false detail and that this means that the K10D figure is inflated? I don't think we should be looking into pushing the K-5 figure but rather bringing down the K10D figure. Agreed?
I still think there is some clarification needed as to whether we are talking about B&W LW/PH in the case of the K10D or not.