11-28-2010, 05:20 AM
[quote name='Michal' timestamp='1290712612' post='4440']
There is one more great thing about old 5D - with it's huge pixels, even so-so lenses perform beautifully - at least in the center <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
[/quote]
On the flipside you get less detail. But if you can live with that amount of detail, I can't see why resizing a 5D2 image down to ~12MP will be worse. So that way, at times when you have better lenses, you can use the [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/5080867269/"]full 21MPs[/url] <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
There is one more great thing about old 5D - with it's huge pixels, even so-so lenses perform beautifully - at least in the center <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
[/quote]
On the flipside you get less detail. But if you can live with that amount of detail, I can't see why resizing a 5D2 image down to ~12MP will be worse. So that way, at times when you have better lenses, you can use the [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/5080867269/"]full 21MPs[/url] <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW