02-09-2018, 09:33 AM
Quote:https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/c..._14_24_28/
The MTFs look substantially better than for the f/4
Stay fair. 14 mm is a bit less complicated to do than 12 mm
Sigma needs to become a bit more careful with their double or triple focal lengths. 14 mm are covered with two zooms, one fast prime, then 20 and 24 the same. 24-35/2 or 24/1.4 and 35/1.4?
It's good to have choices - but somehow it would be better to know about the upcoming choices. I'm not sure if I had chosen the 14/1.8 if I had an idea about the 14-24/2.8 to come. MTF look very good, now I just wonder how flare behaviour will be. And of course, Sigma should and could solve the filter design. It comes either with tulip hood or round without hood, and there's not only the mount conversion service but also the front conversion service. One day they will have an aperture conversion service and we need to decide how many blades we want. :unsure:
