11-28-2010, 10:31 PM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1290940317' post='4514']
For example, in my main area of random wildlife, primes are very limiting and a big aperture is no advantage in the vast majority of scenarios.[/quote]
Popo, I was referring to the 15-85 in particular here... using, say, a 100-400 or a 50-500 for that kind of thing is not all that bad. I mean, even the 800 and the 1200 primes are f/5.6s <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
GTW
For example, in my main area of random wildlife, primes are very limiting and a big aperture is no advantage in the vast majority of scenarios.[/quote]
Popo, I was referring to the 15-85 in particular here... using, say, a 100-400 or a 50-500 for that kind of thing is not all that bad. I mean, even the 800 and the 1200 primes are f/5.6s <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
GTW