• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Sigma 150-500 opinions...
#5
[quote name='inhaliburton' timestamp='1291168696' post='4621']

Thanks to you both for your opinions. I took some shots today with the 150-500 and am not very impressed with the sharpness on the long end.



I will take your advice and return the lens and reconsider.

[/quote]

Don't mean to undermine anyone else's comments but it takes quite a bit of practice to master a 500mm lens... especially when it's a f/6.3. I've used this lens and it produced results I expected to see (i.e. good, for this price-class). I find an argument like a 70-200 or a 70-300's sharper is a bit invalid because they're not 500mm lenses. If you want a stabilised 500mm FOV on your viewfinder, you won't get the same bang per. buck with other lenses.





[quote name='inhaliburton' timestamp='1291168696' post='4621']

My big wish is for the new Nikon 70-200 2.8 with vr.



However, when shooting, I often wish I had more than 200mm.

[/quote]

You add a 2x TC which would give you a 140-400mm f/5.6 equivalent combo for the times you need it. Personally, I wouldn't get a lens if I'd need to use the 2x TC a lot with it.



GTW
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by inhaliburton - 11-30-2010, 01:04 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by Guest - 11-30-2010, 02:02 PM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by Sylvain - 11-30-2010, 03:26 PM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by inhaliburton - 12-01-2010, 01:58 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by genotypewriter - 12-01-2010, 03:51 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by Guest - 12-01-2010, 09:19 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by inhaliburton - 12-01-2010, 11:30 PM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by Guest - 12-02-2010, 08:46 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by inhaliburton - 12-03-2010, 12:59 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by genotypewriter - 12-03-2010, 04:14 AM
Sigma 150-500 opinions... - by Guest - 12-03-2010, 08:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)