Wow, this is as left field as it gets. I told you before - you need to make some "fun" reviews from time to time (although I suggested a Lensbaby at that occasion...) and so you finally decided to create one. 
One issue that I noticed right away: "Wonna see even more ...?" - well, Willy Wanka would like to have a word with you.
I also snickered when reading the "and it's not a must-have lens for the average Bruce and Sheila" line - maybe Bruce Willis could use it to drive nails in, like an old saying about microscopes goes.
Sorry for me being cranky - a sleepless night out shooting with two bodies and four lenses (and man, a 5D Mark II with a 14mm lens goes way wide!) does that to a man. Besides, I found how to stuff three DSLRs and three FF lenses into a basic 4-pocket chestvest.
Bottom line - I'd probably still choose a 150mm or 180mm macro with tubes but this is apparently still good, [friendly, violent] fun.
One issue that I noticed right away: "Wonna see even more ...?" - well, Willy Wanka would like to have a word with you.
I also snickered when reading the "and it's not a must-have lens for the average Bruce and Sheila" line - maybe Bruce Willis could use it to drive nails in, like an old saying about microscopes goes.
Sorry for me being cranky - a sleepless night out shooting with two bodies and four lenses (and man, a 5D Mark II with a 14mm lens goes way wide!) does that to a man. Besides, I found how to stuff three DSLRs and three FF lenses into a basic 4-pocket chestvest.
Bottom line - I'd probably still choose a 150mm or 180mm macro with tubes but this is apparently still good, [friendly, violent] fun.