[Class A]

[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1291289870' post='4695']

Assuming that 100%, 0.5px sharpening is acceptable then it's valid to state that my initial assessment on the K10D vs K5 was wrong.

[/quote]

You don't have to do this, of course, but I was wondering what a corrected comparison would look like? If I simply scale up your result for the K10D to the K-5, based on the difference in vertical resolution, the K-5 should achieve 2959 LW/PH. Does that sound about right and do you think that figure is adequate to compare to the 2350 LW/PH of the K10D?





[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1291289870' post='4695']

However, this does still not negate the statement that the K5 has a comparatively strong AA filter vs the rest of the gang (inc. the K10D).

[/quote]

Well, it is not difficult to be "comparatively strong" if the rest of the gang is pretty weak. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



Klaus, thanks for bearing with me! I know I can be a pain. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />