08-23-2018, 01:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2018, 01:21 PM by stoppingdown.)
I'm totally uninterested from a practical point of view, being fine with Sony. I'm just curious, also about whether my opinion that Nikon is getting out of sync with the mirrorless world is true or not. Well, it's also 50% true, since Nikon 1 was a failure. Now let's see the second attempt.
The most interesting thing, IMO, is the price tag; plus they are not small and retain the classic shape (no humpless models announced), and in the first bunch of lenses there is a highly technical one at ƒ/0.95 (full format). They are clearly giving up with the prosumer segment and only aim at the pro segment.
The most interesting thing, IMO, is the price tag; plus they are not small and retain the classic shape (no humpless models announced), and in the first bunch of lenses there is a highly technical one at ƒ/0.95 (full format). They are clearly giving up with the prosumer segment and only aim at the pro segment.
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.