12-06-2010, 05:09 AM
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1291571116' post='4775']
Don't forget Sigma, especially their wides. The 12-24 EX is a prime example for LA (of the blue-green variety).
[/quote]
Wim, I see you're really bitter about your bad experience with the 12-24 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Actually, most people seem to say that it is a bad lens... but I've seen sample shots and tests by people that suggests there are some good samples out there (especially in regard to CA)... however rare they may be:
http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/sigmalens12-24.htm
http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/sigma_12-24_review.htm
There was a similar claim on 16-9.net about the original 24L.
GTW
Don't forget Sigma, especially their wides. The 12-24 EX is a prime example for LA (of the blue-green variety).
[/quote]
Wim, I see you're really bitter about your bad experience with the 12-24 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Actually, most people seem to say that it is a bad lens... but I've seen sample shots and tests by people that suggests there are some good samples out there (especially in regard to CA)... however rare they may be:
http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/sigmalens12-24.htm
http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/sigma_12-24_review.htm
There was a similar claim on 16-9.net about the original 24L.
GTW