• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Optical Quality Rating Missing
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,103

Reputation: 49
#4
10-19-2018, 10:36 PM (This post was last modified: 10-19-2018, 10:37 PM by Klaus.)
If your photography is centered around wildlife I‘d go the extra mile for the Sports.
Let‘s face it - you will end shooting at the long end and that‘s where the Sports is better than the C.
If the Sports is too much then I‘d probably go with the G2. We haven‘t tested it yet but yes it seems better than the C.

More than anything it is paramount to check the centering of these lenses - see the sticky thread in this forum.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com

Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-19-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-19-2018, 01:25 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by Klaus - 10-19-2018, 10:36 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-21-2018, 08:43 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by davidmanze - 10-22-2018, 07:36 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 07:50 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by davidmanze - 10-22-2018, 08:37 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 09:01 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 12:11 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-24-2018, 01:29 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 02:40 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-24-2018, 02:59 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 03:19 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 11-13-2018, 11:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)