• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > OL rating system
Rover
All-Star
*****
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,198

Reputation: 22
#4
10-22-2018, 04:06 PM (This post was last modified: 10-22-2018, 04:06 PM by Rover.)
Let's not forget that in some cases Klaus and Markus added a secondary "field quality" rating which was usually quite a bit (up to 2½٭) higher than the "technical" rating. It was usually reserved for fast primes that had some glaring deficiency when taken at face value. Sometimes there were even two such ratings added - one for landscape work and one for macro. Example:
http://opticallimits.com/nikon_ff/756-sigmaex2418fx?start=2
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-22-2018, 02:27 PM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 02:49 PM
RE: OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-22-2018, 03:57 PM
RE: OL rating system - by Rover - 10-22-2018, 04:06 PM
RE: OL rating system - by MatjazO - 10-22-2018, 06:07 PM
RE: OL rating system - by Klaus - 10-22-2018, 08:55 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 06:11 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 08:00 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 08:25 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 09:38 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 10:37 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 12:03 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 10:26 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-24-2018, 06:33 AM
RE: OL rating system - by Brightcolours - 10-25-2018, 06:36 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-25-2018, 08:00 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-25-2018, 08:47 AM
RE: OL rating system - by Brightcolours - 10-25-2018, 11:06 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-25-2018, 02:37 PM
RE: OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-25-2018, 05:33 PM
RE: OL rating system - by toni-a - 10-25-2018, 06:57 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)