• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Optical Quality Rating Missing
JJ_SO
All-Star
*****
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,031

Reputation: 22
#13
10-24-2018, 02:59 PM (This post was last modified: 10-24-2018, 03:11 PM by JJ_SO.)
I shoot Nikon and have no idea about Canon.

But the weight difference of Tamron's 70-200/2.8 (1500 gr.) and 100-400 (1135 gr.) appears to be a bit more than only 200 grams... Wink

I also like to add, although I could use the 200 mm extra range, I mostly pack the 100-400. Needs less space and is (on APS-C) sufficient to do these shots: https://sojujo.smugmug.com/Testshots/Tamron-100-40045-63/
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-19-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-19-2018, 01:25 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by Klaus - 10-19-2018, 10:36 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-21-2018, 08:43 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by davidmanze - 10-22-2018, 07:36 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 07:50 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by davidmanze - 10-22-2018, 08:37 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 09:01 AM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 12:11 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-24-2018, 01:29 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 02:40 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by JJ_SO - 10-24-2018, 02:59 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 10-24-2018, 03:19 PM
RE: Optical Quality Rating Missing - by MBaehr - 11-13-2018, 11:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)