01-10-2019, 12:09 AM
The 35 is a bit thinner, about same length as the Sigma Art version, yes - so not smaller. But a lot lighter: 358 to 659 grams. I don't think they could become much smaller, and I don't want that - for some Fuji lenses (like the f/2.0 versions) I don't save much space in my bag - the bags are made for normal sized lenses, smaller lenses just mean more air in the bag. Especially when one lens is ΓΈ 43 and the other 62 mm.
And speaking of wide angle zooms: I know somebody who exchanged his 14/2.8 for the 10-24/4, and now he bought the 14/2.8 again because it's better. The Nikkor Z 14-30 will eat the Fuji zoom for breakfast, even if it's only for more details for the bigger sensor. Here's where I see so much more in the Nikkor pictures than in the Fuji's, although the lenses are very good.
And speaking of wide angle zooms: I know somebody who exchanged his 14/2.8 for the 10-24/4, and now he bought the 14/2.8 again because it's better. The Nikkor Z 14-30 will eat the Fuji zoom for breakfast, even if it's only for more details for the bigger sensor. Here's where I see so much more in the Nikkor pictures than in the Fuji's, although the lenses are very good.