01-27-2019, 03:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2019, 03:22 PM by Brightcolours.)
To claim the difference in IQ is huge between 135 format and cropped digital MF is silly. People who say that either:
Same as that it is pretty difficult to distinguish results from APS-C with FF, with equivalent settings.
In your case, going from 1D-X to MF, my guess is that you get taken in by the higher resolution sensor and the fake detail and oversharpenedness that you get from the lack of AA-filter, and that the size of the sensor has little to do with it.
- Use a lesser lens on 135 format, and claim the difference is because of sensor related things
- Are easily impressed by the oversharpened/false detail - fake sharpness look of the MF results due to the lack of AA-filter
- Don't make actual comparisons but put more thought into the MF shots because of the limitations of the gear, ending up being impressed by their own efforts instead of difference in sensor size.
Same as that it is pretty difficult to distinguish results from APS-C with FF, with equivalent settings.
In your case, going from 1D-X to MF, my guess is that you get taken in by the higher resolution sensor and the fake detail and oversharpenedness that you get from the lack of AA-filter, and that the size of the sensor has little to do with it.