02-03-2019, 08:31 PM
I'd like to make a comment here as well 
. I had a 28 F/1.8 which was clearly better than the one tested here, and actually, it was better than the 85 F/1.8 I had and the 2 other 85 F/1.8s I tried and tested.
I only sold it when I fot my first 24L, the Mark I so to speak, as that was better.
In short, I reckon it si a rather undervalued lens.
HTH, kind regards, Wim
P.S.: the guy I sold it to 6 or 7 years ago still uses it, and still is very happy with it.
. I had a 28 F/1.8 which was clearly better than the one tested here, and actually, it was better than the 85 F/1.8 I had and the 2 other 85 F/1.8s I tried and tested.I only sold it when I fot my first 24L, the Mark I so to speak, as that was better.
In short, I reckon it si a rather undervalued lens.
HTH, kind regards, Wim
P.S.: the guy I sold it to 6 or 7 years ago still uses it, and still is very happy with it.
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
