08-23-2019, 08:02 PM
I fully agree with BC's comment.
FF is only interesting if you want to mostly shoot at f1.4 or f1.2 (few lenses qualify here) or really need more than 24-26MP.
As far as DOF goes, these setups would provide identical looks (in terms of FOV and depth of field - and I'm considering APS-C with a 1.5x crop factor which doesn't include Canon as it features a 1.6x crop factor):
- 16mm f1.4 APS-C = 24mm f2.1 FF
- 35mm f1.4 APS-C = 53mm f2.1 FF
- 56mm f1.2 APS-C = 84mm f1.8 FF
- 16-80mm f4 APS-C = 24-120mm f6 FF
If you think you'd be happy with these and 24-26MP, then there is no reason to move to FF.
FF is only interesting if you want to mostly shoot at f1.4 or f1.2 (few lenses qualify here) or really need more than 24-26MP.
As far as DOF goes, these setups would provide identical looks (in terms of FOV and depth of field - and I'm considering APS-C with a 1.5x crop factor which doesn't include Canon as it features a 1.6x crop factor):
- 16mm f1.4 APS-C = 24mm f2.1 FF
- 35mm f1.4 APS-C = 53mm f2.1 FF
- 56mm f1.2 APS-C = 84mm f1.8 FF
- 16-80mm f4 APS-C = 24-120mm f6 FF
If you think you'd be happy with these and 24-26MP, then there is no reason to move to FF.