(09-04-2019, 09:19 AM)wim Wrote: Hyperfocal distance is overrated IMO.
As to the distance in EXIF: really? On the EOS-R you can actually see the focusing distance in the EVF if you so please. No idea it is stored in the exif, something to check I guess, but I assumed it was, basically because it clearly is something that is available.
Kind regards, Wim
Hyperfocal distance IS overrated, I agree, but was trying to find another reason else than it would be nice to know to what distance the lens was focused.
I could see that in all F-lenses, but in Graphic converter the exif filed of "distance" remained "undetermined". In old Aperture (the nice DAM Apple decided to trash) I could see the focus points and the distance as well. Capture One doesn't show any of them.
(09-04-2019, 09:20 AM)thxbb12 Wrote: This 24 f1.8 is a hard sell compared to the Sony FE 24 f1.4 which is the best 24mm in the industry according to Roger Cicala: "Overall, I have to say the Sony 24mm f1.4 GM is the best 24mm made right now and really a world-class optic.". Source: https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/08/some-new-wide-angle-lens-mtf-tests-sony-24mm-f1-4-gm-sony-35mm-f1-8-tamron-35mm-f1-4-sp/
The Sony is smaller, lighter and more importantly f1.4 instead of f1.8.
This 24 Z is disappointing...
Nothing to add, except "I agree".
