Yes, FF could be a compact system if a manufacturer wanted it to be. With equivalent lenses a FF system could be made about the same size as an APS-C system.
Here are a few examples comparing Fuji X vs Sony FE:
I'm personally more and more interested in Sony FE because it's attracting a lot of 3rd party makers willing to fill this gap. Sony was smart in opening up their mount protocol to others.
I believe it is a big mistake on Nikon, Canon and Fuji's part to not open theirs up.
Here are a few examples comparing Fuji X vs Sony FE:
- Fuji 14 f2.8 vs Samyang 18 f2.8 : The Samyang features a wider FL (18mm vs 21) while being about the same size and 1 stop faster (in term of system equivalence)
- Fuji 35 f1.4 vs Samyang 45 f1.8 : The Samyang is about the same size but faster (f1.8 vs f2.1 equiv)
- Fuji 16 f2.8 vs Samyang 24 f2.8 : The Samyang is smaller while being 1 stop faster (in term of system equiv)
- Fuji 16-55 f2.8 vs Sony FE 24-105 f4 : The Sony is 1cm longer and about the same weight as the Fuji while being slightly brighter (f2.7 equiv) and featuring a longer range (105mm vs 83mm).
I'm personally more and more interested in Sony FE because it's attracting a lot of 3rd party makers willing to fill this gap. Sony was smart in opening up their mount protocol to others.
I believe it is a big mistake on Nikon, Canon and Fuji's part to not open theirs up.