[toni-a]

In other words (talking about imagen quality): FF (mirrorless or DSLR) offers the same quality. But ... FF (MRR or DSLR) vs APSC (MRR or DSLR)?.

I dont shoot wildlife or sport photo. I shoot travel photo (landscapes, cities, people etc etc). For me the most importat is image quality: dynamic range, noise at high isos, sharpness, etc. etc.

I have never used a FF digital camera. All of my bodies have been APSC. This is the reason for my doubt. I am not sure if invert in more APSC system or switch to FF world.

Both produce excellent results, I can't tell from A4 prints which one was taken with 7Dmkii or which one is taken with EOSRP
Where I find real advantages for EOSRP is low light, EOSRP at least one full f stop advantage over 7Dmk2 but this isn't visible on prints before ISO 1600, today I made ISO4000 print from EOSRP it came out crisp and clean, 7DMK2 couldn't achieve that.
In a parallel thinking, my 7DMK2 outperforms my full frame 5D classic in almost everything including noise.
However my 5D classic outperforms any other camera I ever tried for color rendering that's why I kept it