• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED
#2
Hi Kenny,



I can speak only from memory, but I wouldn't second that.. I used the 17-35 for some time on DX, then sold it since I was rather unhappy with the performance. I would say definitely below the 14-24 2.8 in terms of resolution and contrast, I think the N 16-35 might prove already better in optical performance - if you don't need the f 2.8 and need a filter thread? Then I might have had a 17-35 lemon <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />



On the other hand I was very happy with my 14-24 2,8 sample till the day it took a hit <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' /> - actually, together with my D700, while the camera suvived with no problem at all, the front element and the integrated petal hood of the 14-24 got damaged.. Sh.. happens <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by kentcp - 12-17-2010, 12:58 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by wojtt - 12-17-2010, 02:14 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by mst - 12-17-2010, 02:15 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by Brightcolours - 12-17-2010, 03:48 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by mst - 12-17-2010, 03:51 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by PuxaVida - 12-17-2010, 04:44 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by kentcp - 12-18-2010, 03:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)