10-09-2019, 04:06 PM
(10-09-2019, 03:30 PM)JJ_SO Wrote: I've seen other pictures with a separation gap in the sides of the EVF. I guess, the price of around 900.- is without EVF. Else than that, the size of the mount doesn't leave much space to reduce the height. If they also left out the tilt display, the might save a couple mm in depth and else than that, it's sort of a "poor man's mirrorless Nikon". If you see the kit lenses... dp you recall any APS-C kit lens 16-50/3.5-6.3 ?
That's sort of a compact camera's specs and it sucks. But admittedly the lens is rather flat.
And here's a bit extended information for the ones of us less fluent in Japanese
Edit: After viewing the pictures, the EVF is not detachable, but there's an inbuilt flash and a selfie LCD (but maybe only selfies?). I think they also cut costs with a low res EFV (as APS C doesn't need that 3.9 MP of the Z 6/7). And the connectivity possibly lacks of micro/headphone/remote jacks?
On the other side of the price range, an 8000 $ 50/0.95 with a tripod socket which AGAIN doesn't have an Arca profile. Nikon, you're just bloody stubborn. The Sigma 105/1.4 costs 1370.- and comes with Arca foot.
The Nikon has an aperture Ø of 61.05 mm (58 / 0.95), the Sigma 75 mm, I wonder which shows the more creamy bokeh...
The latest/cheapest iteration of the Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS STM is f4-5.6 haha.
I guess Nikon is taking the Canon EF-M 15-45mm f3.5-6.3 IS STM as example?