(02-12-2020, 11:43 AM)mst Wrote: The point of the image was to show the amount of distortion.
I assume this is uncorrected?
This seems like some very heavy distortion no? Maybe similar to XC 16-50 at 16mm?
Wasn't sure if your comment about the image being "promising" was that distortion wasn't that bad, or if the extent of the distortion confirms the impending "bloodbath", as you termed it.