01-04-2011, 10:20 AM
[quote name='Lord Beau' timestamp='1294131173' post='5331']
In all seriousness, is the previous 24-120 VR any worse? According to your tests, not really... [/quote]
I can't tell you, yet. The review published here is a DX review, only. An FX review will follow, though.
[quote name='Lord Beau' timestamp='1294131173' post='5331']
Do we think the 28-300mm VR is going to be any better?
[/quote]
I can already tell you that it has even more pincushion distortion <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
-- Markus
In all seriousness, is the previous 24-120 VR any worse? According to your tests, not really... [/quote]
I can't tell you, yet. The review published here is a DX review, only. An FX review will follow, though.
[quote name='Lord Beau' timestamp='1294131173' post='5331']
Do we think the 28-300mm VR is going to be any better?
[/quote]
I can already tell you that it has even more pincushion distortion <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com