03-14-2020, 08:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2020, 08:17 AM by Brightcolours.)
Thanks JoJu. I have posted them before I am sure, but they illustrate well why these wider angle 1:2 magnification primes are not so uninteresting to others. Of course, these two were done with 35mm APS-C equivalents... But in one image I used that 35mm to create a wider view.
Another APS-C 35mm 1:2 mag. image:
![[Image: 47F3E92B56AA4F338DCF09868DBFB292.jpg]](https://g2.img-dpreview.com/47F3E92B56AA4F338DCF09868DBFB292.jpg)
The 35mm APS-C perspective gives a nice depth with not very distant flowers getting appreciatively smaller.
That effect of course gets more pronounced with 24mm APS-C
![[Image: 705A3F200D154F6B9F401FA2A9EBB2CD.jpg]](https://g1.img-dpreview.com/705A3F200D154F6B9F401FA2A9EBB2CD.jpg)
but the Tamron primes (of course) will show less astigmatism and CA issues.
Another APS-C 35mm 1:2 mag. image:
![[Image: 47F3E92B56AA4F338DCF09868DBFB292.jpg]](https://g2.img-dpreview.com/47F3E92B56AA4F338DCF09868DBFB292.jpg)
The 35mm APS-C perspective gives a nice depth with not very distant flowers getting appreciatively smaller.
That effect of course gets more pronounced with 24mm APS-C
![[Image: 705A3F200D154F6B9F401FA2A9EBB2CD.jpg]](https://g1.img-dpreview.com/705A3F200D154F6B9F401FA2A9EBB2CD.jpg)
but the Tamron primes (of course) will show less astigmatism and CA issues.