05-13-2020, 03:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2020, 03:30 PM by Brightcolours.)
Is that you, Dave? 
It depends on what you find important. Personally, I like making beautiful images, more than making macro images that are about the smallest subject. So, for me 2:1 macro is less important than is rendering, and I would go for the Zeiss 50mm f2.8 for sure, as as far as I have seen, it renders nicer (nice colour and bokeh). https://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/05/06/review-zeiss-50mm-f2-8-touit-fujifilm-x-mount/
But if the higher magnification is important to you, you could make a different choice.
It depends on what you find important. Personally, I like making beautiful images, more than making macro images that are about the smallest subject. So, for me 2:1 macro is less important than is rendering, and I would go for the Zeiss 50mm f2.8 for sure, as as far as I have seen, it renders nicer (nice colour and bokeh). https://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/05/06/review-zeiss-50mm-f2-8-touit-fujifilm-x-mount/
But if the higher magnification is important to you, you could make a different choice.