[davidmanze]

Objectively speaking, I have no complaints concerning EOSRP sensor, a big story is made about its  dynamic range:  11 f stops instead of 14 isn't the end of the world, although 11 fstops is already enough for 99.9% of your shots.
Its color rendition is excellent and noise control very decent, I can safely use up to ISO 12800 without worrying about noise.
I might be biased though since I use it almost exclusively for my kids shots, for landscape I still prefer APS-C. And even if I had a new Sony sensor everyone is raving about 14 f stops dynamic range is only valid at base ISO, since I use my RP in the ISO 400-1600 most of the time I will see little to no difference.
Now as market is shrinking, they are trying to create a demand , going mirrorless already meant replacing the whole gear...

You won't see a difference at base ISO either, unless you for inexplicable reasons are "pulling shadows up" many stops.

.................................................................................

No inexplicable reasons here ...... real ones!

D500:   .... I try to stay down at 200-250 ISO for those very dark (black to the human eye)  glossy ibis/ vultures ..... 1/2500 at F4.5 ...... even lower if possible ....... many at 1/2000 F4 for around 120 ISO ..... there will still be a little noise remaining .....
....... then you can pull those "copper bronze" tones out of their blackness and have that "rarely seen by the human eye" iridescence .....

..... any sort of rise in ISO and you have detail crushing noise ..... and detail looks crude ....
 I've just never bought any of that "don't need 14 stops of dynamic range" business ....... the more the merrier ...... how about 16 stops??

https://www.flickr.com/photos/124690178@N08/